Monthly Archives: April 2012
I checked out the Diablo III open beta weekend last week and here are a few thoughts I’d like to share about it what I thought.
Right off the bat, it was impossible to login for the first few hours. Now I know this was the first open beta of a highly anticipated game (not to mention that it was meant as a stress test), but it made me think about Blizzard‘s decision to force online connectivity for Diablo III. This brings up the discussion about the game being mainly a single-player or multi-player game, and people usually start talking about Diablo 2, duping and so on. What people seem to miss is that while this is a sequel, it’s still a new game and blizzard is trying new things and it shows in other aspects of the game. During the beta I started playing alone but at some point I noticed I could open up my game to the public. Within a few seconds I had a bunch of people running around in my game destroying shit as they went along. It was certainly a quick way to go through beta area, but at times I felt it didnt let me experience the game well since I didnt want to fall behind. I could definitely see myself having fun with a bunch of friends though.
Blizzard also implemented the auction house that should allow players to use real money or in game gold. Now there’s a lot to say about that and it deserves it’s own post, but I just wanted to mention it since it’s another motivation for the online decision. Without dragging this on let’s just say that while I can see this being an issue sometimes when you don’t have internet access or servers are down (knowing Blizzard this wont be too common), it probably won’t be a reason to not buy the game if you’re a fan.
On to gameplay! controls were pretty simple; click to move, right click, left click for main attack skills, 1 2 3 4 for other skills and Q for potions. You unlocked skills as you leveled up and every skill slot you have has a few possible skills you can assign it. This limits the number of skills you can use at any given time and allows for different builds and character customization. each of the skills also has runes that enhance which you also unlock as you level up which adds even more customization. I enjoyed trying out different combos and I hope that all options will be viable and that no builds emerge as the “Best” the same way it often was in WoW.
Loot was abundant. I used the stash a lot to gear up all the characters I made, and it’s obvious that this game makes it easy for someone who is usually lazy when it comes to alts. The crafting system seemed a bit too simple. one thing I didn’t like was that some classes could equip weapons that they couldn’t use, and the only benefit would be from the stats. It seems a shame to turn some cool weapons into simple stat-sticks. I mean come on, a demon hunter can’t swing a sword to save his life? not cool…
Art style is great as expected from Blizzard. Same goes for story, dialogue, music and voice overs. I saw a lot of people complain about the graphics not being that good. I thought the graphics were as good as they needed to be to support the art direction while making sure the game runs smooth on most machines.
Overall regarding the beta, I hated the lag, hated people rushing through the game, hated getting disconnected with different errors all the time. If we look past all that, Diablo III looks like a solid game as expected. Personally, playing with friends is gonna be a huge factor when it comes to when I get the game (yea I didn’t pre-order) and how much time I’ll spend playing it.
This weekend I’ll be playing the Guild Wars 2 beta with some friends on the EU-Underworld server if anyone out there cares to join us. I’ll post character names later. I’m out!
- Blizzard irons out Diablo III wrinkles as 300K simultaneous players participate in beta (digitaltrends.com)
- Diablo III teaser has fans pumped (slashgear.com)
Just a quick post today. There’s a Diablo III open beta this weekend starting tonight around 9 PM if I’m not wrong, so I’ll be playing that this weekend. I’ll let you guys know what I think of it in my next post, and if you try it out yourself we can talk about it more in the comments section. you can create a Battle.net account, create a BattleTag and download the client here.
If anyone wants to join me, I’ll probably post the name i’ll be using in both betas somewhere in the sidebar to the right. For now I’m out!
- This Weekend, Everyone Can Play Diablo III. Even You. And You. (kotaku.com)
- Guild Wars 2 briefs players on next weekend’s beta event (massively.joystiq.com)
For a while now I’ve been thinking about games using the free to play business model. When I read Marcus “Notch” Persson’s thoughts on the subject on his tumblr and more recently in relation to his new game announcement in which he states that free to play is a “scam”. He thinks that free to play should be called “as expensive as you want it to be” since it essentially puts no cap on how much a player can spend. Now all of that is essentially true, but I’m one of those people who think that free to play could be a good thing for both developers and players, IF done properly.
Now while gathering my thoughts on this topic I realized that it is too big to cover in one post, so I’ll try to break it down a little. So for today I’ll talk about the engine in the free to play machine, Micro transactions. Cause let’s face it, developers need to eat too. Micro transactions are those little payments you make in-game on various things like items, characters, extra content…etc (lets call them “items” from now on) . What makes micro transactions good or bad is what you sell, how it affects the game and how much it costs.
The general guide line for using micro transactions well is to sell items that are purely cosmetic and don’t sell items that give players advantage over others. You don’t want to split your player base into people who pay and people who don’t. Getting into a pay to win situation is something all games should avoid. Take Flight Control Rocket for example. The game offers you to continue your game if you pay for it, so you can get as high a score as you want provided you can pay for it. If you wanna read more about how that game tries to take your money, read this article by Ben Kuchera. Another pitfall is implementing micro transactions in a finished game by simply locking content and offering the players the option to buy it. What this does is give the entry level player -who doesn’t want to pay yet- an incomplete game, which makes them feel forced to buy something. That’s not a good way to get people into your game.
Lets take a look at a game that used this system successfully and see how they did it. League of Legends is the game I chose since it seems to be quite popular these days, and I’ve played it enough to understand how it works. for those of you who aren’t familiar with the game, League of Legends or LoL by Riot Games (I know it’s ridiculous) is a Defense of the Ancients-style online multiplayer RTS that uses micro transactions as a source of revenue. I believe they went the free to play way because they wanted to convert players of the original DOTA who haven’t payed for that game since they bought Warcraft 3 (DOTA was a custom map in WC3). Here’s a gameplay video.
The game uses two currencies: Influence points or IP, which you gain by playing matches (you get more for winning), and Riot points or RP, which you buy with money. What the game offers for purchase are 4 things:
- Permanent access to in-game champions.
- Cosmetic Skins for the champions.
- Runes that very slightly enhance your stats or abilities.
- Boosters that allow you to gain IP faster or to level up faster for a period of time.
Lets take the champions first. The fact that there are many champions to choose from is one of the game’s core features, but it is also one of the things that makes it hard for beginners to pick up the game. LoL makes a pool of 10 champions available to play for free at any given time, and changes them every week. This make the choice of champion easier for new players and allows them to get familiar with the champions. The player can then decide to buy any champion he wants to play whenever he wants for a certain amount of IP or RP. The skins can only be purchased with RP. This makes the paying players feel distinguished without giving advantage, thus keeping the free player happy as well.
Runes can be purchased for RP or IP, but their use is based on your level which is determined by the number of games you’ve played. What this means is that even if you can pay for them, you have to earn the right to use them. As far as the boosters go, they just help you earn the points or level up at a higher rate to be able to use the runes, but you still need to play the game to get the benefit of the boost.
Now this system works well for many reasons. The rotation of locked champions becomes a way to ease the players into the game without being a feature locked behind a required payment. It allows players to customize without breaking the balance of the game. Most importantly it unites the players by giving them the freedom to choose if they want to invest their time or their money in the game. I mean let’s face it the people who can afford to pay extra for games are usually people who don’t have much time on their hands to play, but still want to get a match or 2 in at the end of the day.
What “business people” sometimes fail to understand is that online multiplayer games rely on a strong community of players to keep it fun and appealing (Not to mention opening up the e-sport possibility). That’s where even the free players come in as an asset to the game and it’s continuity. You don’t need to make money off every player to turn a profit. I’m out!
So I read this article about a company called Worlds.Inc filing a lawsuit against Activision. They claim that both World of Warcraft and the Call of Duty franchise are in violation of one of their patents. This patent covers a “system and method for enabling users to interact in a virtual space.” and is the same patent they based a similar lawsuit against NCSoft on (case was dismissed after a settlement). and all I can think of is What The Fuck!
So Worlds.Inc apparently has a patent on the Internet? It’s just sad to see a system originally created to stop imitation and promote creativity, be used to stifle innovation and just make money off of retarded patents based on mediocre products. Somebody needs to stop this.
Lets hope Activision does a good job of squashing these guys for good. Maybe then they would try to do something useful instead of wanting money for inventing multiplayer…
Yesterday I talked a bit about CD Projekt Red and mentioned that they had a few things to announce today. So I watched the stream today and here’s what they got: The Witcher: Enhanced Edition is now available for Mac on steam for 9.99€. All owners of The Witcher 2 (physical copy or steam) now have a back up copy on GOG.com, which I thought was kinda nice. Their last announcement was about The Witcher comic which will be available as an interactive digital comic available April 17th on iOS for FREE.
As for GOG.com “Good Old Games“, they announced that they are offering the original Fallout for FREE. They also announced the start of bringing in new titles and indie titles in addition to the classic games they already offer, Starting with a promo offer on Assassin’s Creed and Heroes V (Links in Special Offers page at the top). All these games will be DRM free, which makes me want to talk about DRM and what publishers are doing to “protect” their property.
First let me just get this out of the way.I think pretty much everyone can agree that DRM sucks. We saw it on audio CDs and iTunes..etc. years ago and I think we were all happy that ended. Bad news was that they moved on to games… we’ve seen software like SecuROM using online activation and limiting the number of product activation on different machines. Lots of publishers are moving towards requiring online activation and in some cases requiring the player to remain online while playing with loss of connection kicking you out of the game. Blizzard Tie all their games to Battle.net and even though there was some uproar about Diablo III requiring a constant connection, that died out pretty quickly (Blizzard explained that it was to ensure no cheating/duping) . Ubisoft are using Uplay and EA are pushing Origin and even Steam is kind of annoying when it comes to playing offline.
While all of this isn’t gonna stop us from doing whatever we have to do to play the games we love, it’s a shame that publishers are making legitimate customers jump through so many hoops and limiting their rights when it comes to owning a game. Used to be that buying a game meant you could play it on your machine, take it over to a friend’s place and play it, let them borrow it and just do whatever you wanted. Thats why I like what GOG are doing. They give you the game DRM free, you can install it wherever you want as much as you want, the prices are decent and they bundle the games with extra stuff like soundtracks, artwork and so on. not to mention the free games you get when you first sign-up (some classic goodies).
Here’s hoping we see less corporate greed and more faith in honest gamers. I’m out!
With The Witcher 2 :Assassin’s of Kings “Enhanced Edition” (wow that’s a mouth full) coming out on April 17th, I can’t help but think of the reasons why I seem to feel a lot of loyalty towards CD Projekt Red. Aside from the fact that I loved everything about The Witcher 2, I believe that the fact that the developer continues to show so much good will towards it’s customers is what inspires this loyalty.
While many companies try to fight piracy using ineffective methods, CD Projekt Red announce that they will never again use DRM. The reason they state being that they feel that it doesn’t protect the game and causes complications for legitimate users. I also love that when patching The Witcher 2 they added an arena mode, and with the release of the enhanced edition they are adding more cinematics, locations, characters and quests to the game (around 4 hours of content). Notice that they’re not calling it DLC and charging people for it. quite nice right?
Apparently CD Projekt Red are going to give away “a legendary PC RPG” for free on GOG.com tomorrow, which is also when they’re having their spring conference. From what I understood from this article, this will be available for anyone who already owns The Witcher 2 on PC or anyone who buys it in the future. I’ll update tomorrow when I know more.
Thumbs up CD Projekt Red for being good to their fans. For now check out this cool video, and go get the game 🙂 I’m out!
Alright so this is the first post in my new blog. I’m gonna be talking about gaming related topics here and just share some of my thoughts with you guys. So lets get right to it! Used games!
So there’s been some buzz about used games lately. David Braben of Frontier Development recently said that pre-owned games are “Killing single-player games”in an interview on Gamasutra. Denis Dyack took to the stage next and declared that used games are “Cannibalizing the industry!” in this article . The problem as these guys see it, is that the resale of games means that the only revenue the developers get is from the initial release. Most sales 2-3 months after release tend to be of used copies, which don’t benefit the developers financially. I agree with the last part, but that’s all I agree with them on.
If we consider the statement regarding single-player games, we can see that the industry has indeed shifted towards multi-player games in the recent years. Even single-player games are expected to have some sort of multi-player mode attached to justify the price tag upon release. This doesn’t mean that we can simply say that multi-player is what justifies the price tag. It is just a matter of player’s wanting to get their money’s worth. This can be delivered through multi-player modes, adding replay value, DLC, bigger/longer games, or simply making a game so good that you wouldn’t be able to part with it in-case you ever want to experience it’s awesomeness again.
How about a simple example! Go to your nearest retailers and see how many used copies of Skyrim you can find. I know I haven’t seen that many. Because it’s a good game! I’ve personally put at least 70 hours in it and I haven’t finished it yet. The last time I put the disc into my ps3 was about 2 months ago, but I still look over to the shelf every once in a while and think “Soon…” and I even fantasize about creating at least 2 more characters.
We could also take a look at digital distribution methods such as steam. Even discounted games on steam provide good revenue without having the player feel ripped off. According to Thomas Grip of Frictional Games (Penumbra and Amnesia) his company was kept alive for a while on sales from their own digital store and steam. Wolfire Games support themselves using pre-purchase at a reasonable price and offering buyers access to alpha builds and developer diaries.
Journey is now the fastest selling PSN game ever. Why? Great game, well priced.
Just goes to show you that people are willing to pay for games on release as long as they get their money’s worth. And we’ll keep games that are worth the money paid for them. We sell games to get some money back when the game isn’t worth it.
We’ve been trading, borrowing, buying and selling video games ever since we had them. The game industry is obviously still here. I’m not denying that the market for used games hasn’t gotten bigger, but I do believe that the industry could evolve and maintain the balance.
Im not even going to get into the issue of the player’s rights as an owner of a game disc he/she has purchased… or maybe I should? some other time perhaps. I’m out!